Emeka Ugwuonye, the legal representative of May Edochie, has addressed the co-parenting arrangement between May Edochie and her estranged husband, Yul Edochie, emphasizing that it is not just a moral obligation but a legal requirement for the estranged couple.

In a recent Instagram post, Ugwuonye explained that effective co-parenting demands cooperation and communication between May and Yul Edochie, despite their personal differences. He revealed that the couple is co-parenting effectively, with Yul providing financial support for the children's education and maintaining unrestricted access to them.

"Yes, May and Yul have children together. They will co-parent. Why is that driving anybody crazy? Yul and May are already co-parenting right now, that is the only way it can work. Yul is contributing to the children's school fees and supporting them as well, so he has unlimited access to the kids. That is what co-parenting entails. If they do not speak to each other, they cannot co-parent effectively," Ugwuonye stated.

The lawyer attributed the negative online reactions to ignorance about what co-parenting entails, stressing that both May and Yul have no choice but to work together for the sake of their children, as it is a legal requirement.

"Because many of the supporters on both sides are ignorant, they do not understand the fact that both May and Yul have no other choice over the matter: they have to co-parent," he added.

Judy Austin's Position Clarified

Ugwuonye also addressed speculations about Judy Austin's involvement in the children's lives, stating that she currently has no legal relationship with May and Yul's children. However, he noted that if she marries Yul, she would become the children's stepmother.

"Now, as for Judy, she is not in any legal relationship with May's children. There is no basis for any cooperation between May and Judy. However, if Judy eventually gets married to Yul, that will make her a stepmother to May's children with Yul," the lawyer explained.

Ugwuonye concluded by dismissing public opinion as irrelevant, emphasizing that the law governs co-parenting arrangements, not public perception. The clarification comes amid ongoing public interest in the relationship dynamics between the three parties.

Stay updated on this story and more by following BenriNews on our social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, and Telegram.