The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has demanded full public access and live streaming of the ongoing terrorism trial of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, condemning what it describes as an "unconstitutional media blackout" of the proceedings.

The demand follows the Federal Government's opposition to a request by Kanu's family for live streaming of the court proceedings. This opposition was formally communicated through a letter submitted by the government's lawyer, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo SAN.

In response to the situation, Justice James Omotosho expressed dissatisfaction with what he termed the "unprofessional conduct" of Kanu's legal team, describing them as "mere content creators who did not want an end to the trial for their selfish interest." The judge urged all parties involved, particularly those discussing the case on social media, to maintain professional conduct.

IPOB's spokesman, Emma Powerful, issued a statement highlighting Section 36(3) of the Nigerian Constitution, which stipulates that all criminal trials must be conducted in public. The group argued that conducting Kanu's trial in secrecy violates both "the spirit and letter of the Constitution."

"We remind Justice Omotosho and the legal community that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done," Powerful stated. "The court cannot allow itself to become a willing tool in the hands of the prosecutorial machinery that has, for years, weaponized the media to demonize Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and misrepresent IPOB's lawful pursuit of self-determination."

The group questioned the government's motives for opposing public access to the trial, asking, "Why the secrecy? What are they hiding? If the government truly believes in its case, then let it be tried before the full glare of the Nigerian public and the international community."

IPOB also criticized the testimony of a prosecution witness, referred to as "PW-BBB," claiming the witness's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies and "rehearsed falsehoods" that have "clearly rattled the state."

The group's demands include immediate live streaming of all proceedings, unrestricted access for independent media organizations and international observers, and an end to what they describe as "biased and manipulated reporting by compromised media outlets."

"This case is not just about Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. It is about the integrity of the Nigerian judiciary, the sanctity of the Constitution, and the right of every citizen to a fair and public trial," the statement concluded.

Nnamdi Kanu, who has been in detention since June 2021 following his extraordinary rendition from Kenya, faces terrorism-related charges brought by the Nigerian government. The case continues to draw significant attention both domestically and internationally.