The United States Supreme Court delivered a significant victory to President Donald Trump on Friday regarding his executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship for children born to foreigners on short-term visas or those without legal status in the country.
In a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the Supreme Court granted Trump's request to narrow injunctions that had previously blocked his controversial birthright citizenship order nationwide.
Limited Relief to Plaintiffs Only
The justices ruled that lower courts can only grant relief to individuals or groups who directly brought lawsuits challenging the order, rather than extending those decisions to protect others who were not parties to the litigation.
"The universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation's history," Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in the majority opinion.
This ruling effectively limits the scope of judicial relief unless plaintiffs go through the process of converting their lawsuits into class actions that would cover broader groups of people.
Constitutional Questions Remain Unresolved
Lower courts had previously granted nationwide injunctions against Trump's executive order, arguing that it was "patently unconstitutional" because it conflicts with Supreme Court precedent and the text of the 14th Amendment, which has historically been interpreted to grant citizenship to all persons born on U.S. soil.
However, the Supreme Court did not rule on the underlying constitutionality of Trump's executive order in Friday's decision, leaving that fundamental question unresolved for now.
Strong Dissent from Liberal Justices
The three liberal justices on the court issued a forceful dissent, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson writing that "the Court's decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law."
The dissenting justices maintained that the President's directive is clearly illegal, suggesting deep divisions within the court on this contentious issue.
This ruling represents a procedural victory for Trump's immigration agenda, though the substantive constitutional questions surrounding birthright citizenship remain to be fully adjudicated in future cases.
The case highlights ongoing tensions between executive authority and constitutional protections in the realm of immigration policy, an issue that continues to divide both legal experts and the American public.
Stay updated on this developing story by following BenriNews on our social media platforms:
